• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Arkitektur- og designhøgskolen i Oslo
  • PhD
  • Arkitektur / Architecture
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Arkitektur- og designhøgskolen i Oslo
  • PhD
  • Arkitektur / Architecture
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Construction of an exhibition within architecture culture deconstructivist architecture, The Museum of Modern Art, 1988

Di Carlo, Tina
Doctoral thesis, Peer reviewed
Thumbnail
View/Open
DiCarlo_omslag.pdf (657.4Kb)
DiCarlo_materie.pdf (296.0Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2384380
Date
2016
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Arkitektur / Architecture [33]
Abstract
The 1988 Deconstructivist Architecture exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, curated by Philip Johnson and Mark Wigley, was

a minor exhibition that forced architecture to change directions. The tenweek exhibition showed ten projects by seven architects, staged in three galleries. Polemics surrounded the exhibition. These polemics, coupled with Johnson’s reputation and the extreme formal reduction of the show, fueled interest within the press. The exhibition received more than double the press of any previous architecture exhibition at MoMA and up to five times that of the other four exhibitions within the Gerald D. Hines Interests Program in Architecture. The timing of the exhibition was integral to its effect. It coincided with the proliferation of architecture exhibitions and museums across America and Europe. They reflected pluralistic and historical positions in architecture. New technologies and the media as the message reflected a broader cultural conditions. They entered into the production and circulation of architecture and the exhibition. Deconstructivist Architecture is often thought to have dealt a death knell to postmodern architecture, despite that “there has never been a consensus as to what Post-modern architecture is.”1 Yet beyond the beginning or end of a style or movement, could Deconstructivist Architecture be considered instead, as Sylvia Lavin suggests in her 1988 review of the exhibition, “as a critical methodology and analytical strategy?
Publisher
The Oslo School of Architecture and Design
Series
CON-TEXT. PhD thesis;79
Copyright
Tina Di Carlo

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit